case law on doctrine of ultra vires No Further a Mystery
case law on doctrine of ultra vires No Further a Mystery
Blog Article
Because the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be arrived at, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) from the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other sufficient remedy is provided by regulation." It is properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust readily available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether These remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
In addition it addresses the limitation period under Article 91 and a hundred and twenty with the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to seek cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule eleven CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that as soon as the act of misconduct is recognized along with the employee is found guilty after owing process of law, it's the prerogative in the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, from the various penalties provided in regulation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed will not be proportionate with the seriousness in the act of misconduct isn't suitable however the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion in the structured and lawful manner. Read more
However it really is made apparent that police is free to take action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities topic to legislation. However no harassment shall be caused towards the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of legislation. Police shall also be certain respect on the family get rid of in accordance with regulation and if they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they might act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall protected concrete evidence and acquire necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate as being a issue of security in the house is concerned, which is just not public place under the Act 1977. nine. Considering the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition is attained. For that reason, this petition is hereby disposed of from the terms stated higher than. Read more
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice from the Peace u/s 22-A is just not obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing on the accused party; nor obliged to essentially or mechanically issue directions for registration of here FIR; but is required to look at all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are many of the relevant factors. Read more
In federal or multi-jurisdictional regulation systems there may exist conflicts between the different reduce appellate courts. Sometimes these differences is probably not resolved, and it could be necessary to distinguish how the regulation is applied in one district, province, division or appellate department.
Only the written opinions with the Supreme Court along with the Court of Appeals are routinely accessible. Decisions from the reduced (trial) courts aren't generally published or distributed.
12. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons having their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is usually a condition precedent for appointment to your Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to a Government service could be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to perform away with the candidature of your petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: 15-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be nicely-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety times. When the appeal just isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she will then method the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, since the ninety times with the department to act has already expired. About the aforesaid proposition, we're guided through the decision on the Supreme Court within the case of Dr.
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability inside the matter, but couldn't be answerable in almost any way for their actions. When the court delayed making such a ruling, the defendants took their request towards the appellate court.
Preceding 4 tax years interpreted. It's not from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
refers to law that comes from decisions made by judges in previous cases. Case law, also known as “common law,” and “case precedent,” provides a common contextual background for certain legal concepts, and how they are applied in certain types of case.